Book a walkthrough
Home / Platform

One engine, four kinds of risk, kept current.

What you can assess, how it stays up to date, the methods it brings, and how it connects to the systems and AI tools you already run.

Four areas Continuous by default Connecting the islands Built for your enterprise AI Your method, every time Three ways to use it
Third parties
Internal controls
Regulation
Customers
Reads what you already haveDocuments, procurement, GRC records, inherent risk data, ratingsSee every source →
CyberContextOne engineSame measures · same evidence standard · always current
Ranked actionsWhat to do first, with an owner
AlertsWhen something changes
Answers for your AISourced, from our agents
What you assess

Four kinds of risk. One way to read them.

Every area runs on the same engine and the same screen. Learn it once for vendors and you can read your applications, your regulatory programs and your customer contracts the same way.

Third Parties

"Which vendors handling our customer data can we actually prove are controlled?"

Vendors, partners and acquisitions, scored on everything they've shared and everything they publish.

Internal Controls

"Is this application's control design sound, and where are the gaps?"

Systems and processes assessed against your standards, with your existing register brought in.

Regulation

"What does this rule require of us, and what changed since last quarter?"

Regulations taken straight from the official source, turned into obligations, and tracked as they change.

Customers

"What have we promised on breach notice, across every customer?"

Your customers' contracts read against what you're willing to accept, compared side by side. Their security questionnaires answered from your own evidence.

Same measuresSame dashboardSame evidence standard
Continuous by default

The advice updates itself. You hear about it when it matters.

An analysis stays current for as long as nothing it depends on changes. A new SOC report, a renewed contract, fresh survey answers or a change in what you buy from a vendor brings it back up to date, and anything that needs a decision lands in one list, most important first.

  • Recommendations rerun as new evidence arrives, with no one pressing a button.
  • Alerts you choose, as they happen or in one morning email, and only when the answer changed.
  • Analyses go out of date when the facts change, not when the calendar does.
  • Framework and regulation updates arrive as upgrades you can preview before they apply. No rework.
Needs you3 items
  • 1
    Wickerby Docs: new SOC 2 report changed the result
    Access reviews now fail. Residual risk moved from Medium to High.
  • 2
    Wrenfield Benefits: contract renewed without a breach notice term
    The previous contract had one.
  • 3
    State privacy act amended
    Two obligations changed. Three applications are assessed against them.
Example data · try "Not now"
Connecting the islands

Every team holds a piece of the risk. No one sees all of it.

Legal has the contract. Procurement knows what data the vendor touches. Security has the rating. The GRC team has the controls and findings. CyberContext connects to the systems each team already uses and puts the pieces together, so the risk can be ranked and acted on.

LegalContracts and agreementsSharePoint · Microsoft 365
ProcurementSpend, data shared and inherent risk inputsCoupa · your intake or tiering system, through the API
GRCControls, risks and findingsImported from your GRC tool, with a preview before anything is written
SecurityRatings, assessments, eventsRating reports · news feeds
ComplianceRegulations and obligationseCFR
VendorsAudit reports and trust centersCollected from the vendor
CyberContextOne view of the risk. One ranked list of what to do.
Kept current as any island changes. Open to your own systems and AI through the API.
Today

Six teams, six systems, a spreadsheet to stitch them together once a year.

With CyberContext

A change on any island reaches the risk, the recommendation and the person who owns it.

Built for your enterprise AI

Your AI assistant asks. CyberContext's agents answer with evidence.

Your company is rolling out an AI assistant. CyberContext is the assurance engine behind it. Its agents do the assurance work: they read every source, check each answer against its passage, and keep it current. Your assistant brings the conversation and gets answers that are sourced and safe to act on.

Your peopleAsk in plain language, where they already work
Your AI assistantMicrosoft Copilot, Claude and other agent tools
CyberContextEvidence, risk and recommendations, kept currentThe answers your assistant can stand behind
Your systemsContracts, procurement, GRC, security, regulations

What your assistant gets from CyberContext

  • Answers with sources.Every result points to the passage it rests on.
  • The same answer every time.A change in the answer means the evidence changed.
  • Current without being asked.The work happens in the background, so answers are ready when asked.
  • Each person's own view.The assistant signs in as the user and sees only what they can.
  • Nothing changes without a yes.Anything that changes data waits for someone to agree.
you › Which high-risk vendors have nothing independent behind their score?
Two of your 14 high-risk vendors rest only on self-attestation:
  Vessimor Payroll ····· trust 28 · survey only
  Glenvarra Networks · trust 35 · survey only
you › Run a gap analysis for Vessimor against our payroll vendor requirements.
I'll create the analysis with the "Payroll vendors" requirement set and Vessimor's documents. Go ahead?
you › Yes.
✓ Analysis started · results in Vessimor's findings
Your method, every time

Start from a proven approach. Make it yours. Apply it the same way everywhere.

Risk packs

The risks that matter

A ready-made view of what can go wrong, with the reasoning behind it, so a new program doesn't start from a blank page.

Requirement packs

What good looks like

Requirements you can apply in one step and change to fit, without rebuilding them for every framework.

One risk, everywhere

Framework, survey, contract

The same risk connects to framework controls, survey questions and contract terms, so one answer informs all three.

Three ways to use it

A shared interpretation of evidence and risk. Use it however your team works.

The app

For risk, compliance and legal teams

An enterprise service you sign in to, with nothing to install. Work the ranked list, review what changed and sign off, or ask its built-in AI assistant, which can start an analysis and follow it to the end.

The API

For your engineers and systems

Push documents in and pull results out to your GRC, ticketing and reporting tools. It's the same API the Copilot agent and the Claude skill use to reach CyberContext's agents.

Your AI assistant

For anyone, where they already work

Have Microsoft Copilot, Claude Code or your own agents call CyberContext's agents, and get sourced answers back. A Copilot agent and a Claude skill come ready-made, and your own agents use the same API.

Same data, same permissions, same answer whichever way you ask. Your own dedicated instance, hosted for you. Private deployments on request.

See it on your own documents.

Bring a few you're unsure about: a vendor's audit report, a customer contract, an application's policies or a new rule. We'll show you what needs fixing, what needs proof, and what you can stop worrying about.

We'll use your details only to arrange the walkthrough. See our privacy policy.