Continuous Assurance Intelligence

Assurance that runs itself. Decisions that stay yours.

CyberContext reads the evidence on every vendor, application, regulation and contract, keeps it current, warns you about the changes that matter, and tells your team what to do next.

Built for regulated industries: financial services, insurance, healthcare and government.

One engine for
This morning · 3 changes raised your exposure
  • 1
    Customers
    Thalwick Health · new security addendum
    Asks for 24-hour breach notice. You accept 72.
    Action open · owner: Security operations
  • 2
    Third parties
    Wickerby Docs · new SOC 2 report
    3 of 217 requirements changed. Access reviews now have an exception.
  • 3
    Regulation
    State privacy act amended
    2 obligations change for 3 applications.
Found overnight. Ranked by exposure. Acted on with an owner.
Example data, fictional names
Assurance has changed

From a yearly exercise to a system that keeps working.

Assurance used to be
With CyberContext
Finding out at the annual review
Risk read again whenever evidence, a contract or a rule changes
Annual questionnaires and reviews
Every source read as it arrives
One document at a time
Contracts, audit reports, ratings and policies read together
A findings list sorted by count
The next step, ranked by risk
An email someone has to act on
An action opened, owned and tracked to closure
A spreadsheet rebuilt every year
A record of every decision, kept current
Outcome 1 · Fewer analyst hours

When something changes, review what changed. Nothing else.

Most review work is rereading what hasn't changed. CyberContext puts only the differences in front of your team.

Wickerby Docs · SOC 2, FY2026 vs FY2025Example
214unchanged · approvals carried over
3changed · review these
1new provider
  • !
    Quarterly access reviews
    FY2024MetFY2025Partly metFY2026Not met
    Slipped two reports running. The auditor noted an exception.
  • ~
    Backup restore testing
    MetPartly met
    Tested once a year, not twice.
  • ↑
    Encryption key rotation
    Partly metMet
  • +
    New hosting provider
    Its controls are excluded from the report
  • Re-review only what changed.A new audit report, contract, policy or amendment updates the assessment and shows the differences, so your team doesn't start over.
  • Start each day with what raised your exposure.Changes are ranked across every area by the risk they affect and by how much is at stake.
  • Framework updates without rework.Requirement sets are upgraded in place, and each upgrade shows what will change before it's applied. Nobody rewrites a prompt.
How it stays current without anyone pressing a button →
Outcome 2 · Fewer surprises

Find the gap before an auditor, a regulator or a customer does.

Contracts, audit reports, policies and rules each tell part of the story. CyberContext reads them together and follows the risk wherever it leads.

See the providers behind your vendorAnd the duties their reports hand back to you.
Third parties Vessimor Payroll · providers and dutiesExample
Cloud hosting providerControls tested
Payment processorLeft out of report
Duties handed back to you4 handed to you · 1 your evidence doesn't show
SOC 2 coverage periodJan 1 – Dec 31, 2025
Compare one term across every contractSee each contract's answer, and which ones fall outside what you accept.
Customers Breach notice · across 12 contracts
Meets your terms9 customers
Partly within your terms2 customers
Outside your termsThalwick Health
See what's getting worseEach analysis is compared with the ones before it, and you're told when the trend turns down.
Internal controls Claims portal · residual risk over time
Alert raisedGood → Fair across 5 analyses
NovJanMarJunSep
See what changedA new report or an amended contract is read as soon as it arrives, a rule is compared with its last version each time you refresh it, and you see which results moved.
3results changed this week
Decide on risk, not requirement countsGaps roll up into risk areas, each with how strong it is and how far to trust the evidence.
3risk areas, not 217 requirements
How every source is read against the risk →
Outcome 3 · Decisions you can defend

Show an auditor, a regulator or your board exactly why you made the call.

Decision record · Customers · exampleThalwick Health security addendum accepted, with one exceptionby Dana Ortiz, Deputy General Counsel · Sep 12, 2026
Document read
Security addendumdraft 3, received Sep 2
Read against
Customer acceptance criteriaversion 2.0, fixed
Result
27 within what you accept · 1 exception accepted with an owner
Told
Legal and security operations subscribers
  1. Finding · Breach notice, beyond what you acceptException owner: R. Patel, Security operations
  2. Criterion"Breach notice no shorter than 72 hours," acceptance criteria version 2.0
  3. Quote, checked on page 4Provider shall notify Customer within twenty-four (24) hours of discovery.
  4. Source documentSecurity addendum, draft 3, as received Sep 2
  • A quote under every conclusion.Checked on its page, under a fixed version of the requirements, so the answer can't drift after you've relied on it.
  • A trail from finding to source.Finding, report result, quote, page, and the exact versions of the document and the requirements used.
  • A record of every review.Every approval, disagreement and score change on a requirement is recorded with who made it and when, and so is every finding opened in CyberContext. The people who follow an assurance area are emailed when something needs them.
How every answer is tied to its source →
From alert to closed

It doesn't stop at telling you.

What it finds becomes an action with an owner, and the action clears when new evidence shows the fix is in place.

  1. NoticeSomething changedNew evidence, a renewal or a rule change, ranked by exposure.
  2. DecideThe next step is clearA recommendation with its reason, its risk and an owner.
  3. ActThe action is openedTracked as a finding and sent to the tools your team already uses.
  4. CloseClosed by your teamWhen new evidence shows the fix, the recommended action drops away. Your team decides when the finding is closed.
Example · Customers A customer's addendum asks for 24-hour breach notice Exception opened, owned by security operations Action sent to their work queue Revised incident procedure uploaded and read, the action cleared, the team closed the finding
Fits the way you already work

Connected to your systems, under your permissions, behind your AI.

Behind your AI

Your agents call ours.

Hand assurance work to CyberContext from Claude Code, Microsoft Copilot or your own tools, or use the AI assistant built in. Either way, our agents read the evidence, check every answer against its source, and send back results that are sourced, current and the same every time.

Your own instance

Your systems, your permissions.

Each customer gets its own dedicated instance, connected to the systems you already run. Private deployments on request. Every person, and every agent acting for them, sees only what they're allowed to see, and nothing changes without someone agreeing to it.

Connecting the islands

Every team holds a piece of the risk.

Legal has the contract, procurement knows what data the vendor touches, and security has the rating. CyberContext puts the pieces together.

SharePointMicrosoft 365CoupaServiceNowTrust centersAPI
More on working with your AI →
Ready when you are

Start measuring this week, not next quarter.

Packs snap together the risks to watch and the requirements that evidence them, by industry and by what the vendor or application does. Use ours as they are, adjust them, or build your own, and CyberContext starts measuring as soon as documents arrive.

Risk packsWhat can go wrong
Financial servicesHealthcareSaaSCloud infrastructureAI and ML providersInternal applications
Requirement packsWhat good looks like
Vendor contracts: SaaS, license, servicesSecurity, privacy and AI termsSOC 2NIST CSF 2.0Vendor and application surveys
Risk-requirement packsBoth, already joined
HealthcareSaaSInternal applicationsEach in a core and a full version

Example: Install the Healthcare Third-Party Risk-Requirement Pack and start measuring assurance for your third parties the same day.

Works with the frameworks you're held to
Ready to use
SOC 1SOC 2ISO 27001NIST CSF 2.0Secure Controls Framework (SCF)PCI DSSNYDFSU.S. federal regulations (eCFR), such as HIPAA and GLBA
Built on request
COSOCOBITNIST Privacy FrameworkNIST AI RMFDORAITGC
Curated by us
Vendor contractsCustomer contractsSecurity, privacy and AI termsVendor and application surveys
Yours
Bring your own requirements, or build them from any of the above
Our own securitySOC 2 Type 2 report available under NDA.

Built by people who have run security, risk and compliance programs in financial services, healthcare and government. Meet the team →

See it on your own documents.

Bring a few you're unsure about: a vendor's audit report, a customer contract, an application's policies or a new rule. We'll show you what needs fixing, what needs proof, and what you can stop worrying about.

We'll use your details only to arrange the walkthrough. See our privacy policy.